With the devastating political, legal and economic consequences of not repairing the confiscations under the "soil and industrial reform" of 1945-49 after turning deals Erimar from the East in a three article series. Read after the first part "Proteststrurm against expropriation" now following the 2nd Part of the concealment of the true cost of non-reparation for our economy. Erimar von der Osten writes a blogger for the "Free World", the Internet and newspaper blog for civil society. Until today, every government failed us, the billion-dollar losses in the context of loss-management of old factory buildings, meadows and arable land their citizens expect. People's representatives and officials silent German taxpayers the huge personnel costs, the state spends, this lack of management to maintain. You failed to mention

that they surreptitiously Americans - correctly - to pay full market value paid, while their own citizens as second-class citizens abstempelten.  The state was probably not simply felt then, its citizens a full invoice. First he robbed its citizens, then it seems to them as taxpayers, his lack of management to finance. And if a critical citizens but nachhakt, he expects the gains from the sale of Hehlerware before, as if it should appear comforting at Beutezug to be involved. And then when another aufmuckt, morally indignant about, say government officials of any stripe hypocritical, it would have been a conflict between Eastern and Western citizens want to avoid, as if this is not a classic civil-conflict states. An acquisition program, under which Konfiskationsopfer favors acquire their property "may", carries two major birth blemish. Firstly, in fact, only those participants who just at the time of tendering their assets sufficiently much time, money and courage had to be successful in the long - often intransparent - sales procedures to be able to bid. Secondly, the Act and its associated land acquisition regulation while ostensibly a discounted purchase option - but the advantage is in the way of long-term ownership restrictions in effect repealed. Failure of the judiciary Perhaps it was the scale and brazenness of the raid, including the judiciary, the corrective action would have to intervene in a rigid corporate transferees. Perhaps it was only at the intimate friendship of a alpha male animal and his followers: the reunification of Chancellor Helmut Kohl and Roman Herzog, who as president of the Federal Constitutional Court on cases of these crimes denounced government, headed by Kohl and exkulpierte. Even when it became known that the Kohl government targeted the property of victims of communist despotism to be brought, because the sales would benefit (and in doing so to the detriment of all horrendous verkalkulierte), German courts failed due correction performance. Back then, already the constitutional political question whether the exclusion of Bodenrefomopfer move will be or will wahlunerhebliche minorities with new fundamental rights, according to political expediency, would be expected. Only recently, has long since divorced from office, Roman Herzog suggests, that the history of the depictions of the Kohl government had to re-evaluate. "In the interests of citizens" In good times may be the state with many outrages that come out, their government representatives permission mantra-like "in the interest of the citizens' attempt to conceal. If the public sector but begins with tax money indirectly (in the interest of the citizens?) Gigantic speculative operations, such as Sachsen LB, IKB or Bayern LB happened, and after this thoroughly in the pants were, state-funded rescue operations organized, must be citizens ask why in a constitutional state, which is in Germany still in the high ground there, not the judiciary finally intervenes and machinations of this kind will also investigate if government officials were involved, even at the risk that a result of official claims could. For a parliamentary treatment of these processes in cases of victims bundesrepublikansicher expropriation policy since 1990, it would never be too late. The victims of land reform was not to enforce liability or criminal claims, but an honest and fair assessment of their property and property positions. The associations of the expropriation of casualties is not money, but that the affected part of your property back, after the reunification of the public sector and not by East German citizens was held. It were the settlers and managers of the East German part of the assets treat. It was they who sought compensation and its contribution to this effort wanted to because it is more than the State East-West conflict shy. It is not too late in the way of a parliamentary debate rules to find the people concerned in the east and the west part in their ancient rights and the state in its constitutional barriers refer. DER SPIEGEL and especially about the FAZ have years of real Hintergünde entlarvt this raid, the government tried to hush up. The editors of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung has many solutions given a voice. We expect hard times. There is a lack trillion to finance the pensions as soon as the baby boomers retire. The confidence of citizens in the state will continue to subside. The issue is the shortage in the supply of employment and the increase in part with a little added secure employment, thus the proportion of those who through the grid of social security are increasing. It is very important that the state is not so blatantly planned on foreign assets, but measures of this dimension is much broader discussion than is currently happening. This includes the fundamental debate that asks the basic ideas of our economic order still remains viable, fundamentally what parts need to be reformed. Read this article on "FreieWelt.net", the communications platform of civil society on the Internet

Tags: economic consequences, legal, political

Posted on: April 26, 2009

Filed under: About law